Johnwen, where have you actually answered my questions? I just pointed out that I'm still waiting for an answer to my question about how it works out when supplemental cortisol is given to a patient whose body is not making enough,
and your response is once again not to answer that question but to complain that I am merely baiting you, and invoke Owen's authority.
Your derogatory comments that were attached and making unsubstantiated and unfounded responses on this item led me to ignore your ignorance on the subject at hand.
I didn’t invoke Owen’s authority It was a request to either get involved with a trouble maker or I will address it myself. Which is another twisting of the facts that you are so good at. So since he moved all your derogatory and judgmental comments over to another thread it was a matter of “Go for it,” on his part. So I will proceed to dissect your lack of discretions as I see fit!
Look, I have a problem with people who give other diabetics and /or potential diabetics bad information.
That is where I'm coming from. It's not some ulterior motive over you personally.
This is another example of a judgmental statement made by a person who has no clinical experience and does not have the capabilities or authority to either threat or diagnose a condition such as diabetes and is trying to say to one who does, that they are lacking in knowledge because of something he got from the internet.
The quote I placed on the above form Albert Einstein, Kind of says it all about that. “Information is NOT knowledge!”
I understand that you are a well established personage on this forum, and that you are very involved with it.
But if you are such a hotshot doctor, you should be able to back up the things you've said to me better.
Another antagonistic Comment! Why would I have to explain anything to you in the first place if you got a problem with something I say. “Prove it wrong!” The burden of the proof is always on the accuser. That’s you, in case your wondering! You’re the one saying I’m wrong! Prove otherwise or shut up and learn!
You have also now openly admitted to taunting me on purpose. You are extremely unprofessional, in my opinion.
This another degrading and judgmental insinuation. Not taunting I was confirming that your misleading and misconstrued questions were in fact antagonism to incite a personal reaction. As a experienced professor I have become pretty good at spotting real concerning questions and those that are taken out of context to incite a response. Then followed by a dismissive and intimidating comment. “Which you do quite often!” Which are Not real questions but incitements intended to disrupt others. Personally and others agree that they, we and me don’t give a dam what your opinion is anyway!
Owen doesn't have to do anything. It's obvious to me that you are a person who values his own authority
over anything else, even helping people. Don't worry, you don't have to get into a knock down drag out
fight with me and threaten Owen with the prospect of a XXX rated site, because I am just going to simply add
you as the only person on my foes list here. Simple, problem solved.
What does this have to do with the price of tea in china? Same thing, Who cares who’s on your Foes list anyway you haven’t posted anything worth while anyway and I don’t see anything in the future. Like the post you started about V-C and glucose that subject was covered very thoroughly. Back in December of 2012 with the use of a glucose meter.
But I guess you haven’t learned how to read prior articles. It obvious to me that your not at this forum to learn but only to antagonize and demoralize for what ever your under handed reasons are and trying to disrupt what is being done here!
Your probably a plant from some Drug Company trying to knock this website down, time will tell. If you are it would nice if they sent someone who can’t be called out as easy as you!
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is